Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Campuran (Blended Learning) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa SMA: Suatu Kajian Systematic Literature Review
SLR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/nara.v5i2.439Keywords:
Blended learning, Hasil belajar, Kimia, Pembelajaran daringAbstract
Pendidikan global saat ini menghadapi dinamika yang kompleks. Setelah pandemi COVID-19, perubahan dalam metode pengajaran telah mendorong adopsi model pembelajaran campuran juga dikenal sebagai blended learning secara luas. Dalam pendidikan kimia di sekolah menengah atas, model ini dianggap sangat relevan karena memungkinkan penggunaan media yang fleksibel dan interaktif untuk membantu siswa memahami materi abstrak. Namun masih sangat sedikit penelitian sistematis yang secara khusus mengevaluasi seberapa efektif pembelajaran campuran (blended learning) di tingkat SMA pada pembelajaran kimia. Penelitian ini menggunakan Metode Systematic Literature Rewiew (SLR) dengan pedoman PRISMA untuk memberikan Gambaran menyeluruh tentang seberapa efektif model pembelajaran campuran (blended learning) dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar kimia siswa di sekolah menengah atas. Dari 270 artikel awal yang ditemukan 8 artikel yang memenuhi kriteria kelayakan tinggi dipilih untuk dianalisis lebih lanjut setelah melalui proses penyaringan yang ketat dan ekslusi. Pencarian literatur menyeluruh melalui basis data ERIC, Scopus dan Google Scholar. Hasil sintesis literatur menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan pembelajaran campuran (blended learning) dapat meningkatkan prestasi akademik siswa, motivasi belajar dan kemampuan untuk belajar sendiri. Secara khusus penggunaan teknologi seperti laboratorium virtual terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan pemahaman siswa tentang konsep pada tingkat representasi simbolik, makroskopik dan molekuler. Pembelajaran campuran (blended Learning) merupakan model yang sangat berguna dan berpotensi mengubah pembelajaran kimia di sekolah menengah atas. Namun untuk menerapkannya dengan sukses dan berhasil, ada masalah dengan infrastruktur, pemerataan akses digital dan kesiapan guru.
References
Almarzuqi, A. A., Sulaiman, T., & Mustakim, S. S. (2024). Effects of blended learning through lab-rotation (bllr) model on motivating high school students to learn chemistry subject. International journal of academic research in business & social sciences, 14 (6), . https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i6/21682
Almarzuqi, A. A., Sulaiman, T., & Mustakim, S. S. (2024). The effectiveness of blended learning on critical thinking skills among secondary school students in chemistry subject. International journal of academic research in business & social sciences, 14 (6), . https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i6/21681
Anil, J. A. J. (2023). Effect of blended learning strategy on secondary school students' achievement in chemistry. International Journal of Science and Research, 12(4), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.21275/sr23403163317
Bandara, N., & Jayaweera, B. P. A. (2024). Commentary on the applications of blended learning in the teaching and learning process – a review. https://doi.org/10.70232/jrep.v1i2.10
Botelho, T. D. S. G., Jardim, M. I. D. A., & Mano, A. D. M. P. (2022). International panorama of blended learning in science education: A systematic review. Revista Electrónica deInvestigación en Educación en Ciencias, 17 (2), . https://doi.org/10.54343/reiec.v17i2.350
Castro, R. R. (2025). The effects of chemistry virtual laboratories in academic achievement of secondary level learners: A meta-analysis. Integrated Science Education Journal, 6 (1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1379
Chan, P., Chan, P., Gerven, T. V., Dubois, J., & Bernaerts, K. (2021). Virtual chemical laboratories: A systematic literature review of research, technologies and instructional design. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CAEO.2021.100053
Eidelman, R. R., & Shwartz, Y. (2021). Promoting self-regulated learning by designing a chemistry online blended learning environment. Long-term research and development in science education, 44-70. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004503625_003
Hafiz, M. S., Agustini, K., & Suartama, I. K. (2025). Blended learning and its impact on 21st century student learning. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies, 26 (3) https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v26i3.1449
Jusuf, M., & Nasaru, S. B. (2022). Blended learning dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar kimia dengan menggunakan model flipped classroom. Pedagogika, 13(1), 73-85. https://doi.org/10.37411/pedagogika.v13i1.1271
Li, S., & Wang, W. (2022). Effect of blended learning on student performance in k-12 settings:A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38 (5), 1254-1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12696
Mahardika, W. A. K., Tiwow, V. M. A., & Suherman, S. (2020). Implementation of blended learning based on moodle on student’s chemistry learning outcome at class X in SMA Negeri 3 Poso. Jurnal Akademikia Kimia, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.22487/J24775185.2019.V8.I3.PP176-172
Munawar, D. U., Khan, D. A. R., Suleman, D. Q., & Ali, M. M. (2023). Blended learning's effectson teenagers' secondary-level academic performance in the matter of chemistry. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v11i1.1458
Muzafar, N., & Ahmad, N. J. (2024). The new norm: Evaluating blended learning in science education – a systematic review. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 9 (55), 790-809. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.955053
Nguyen, V. D., Vu, Q. T., Chu, V. T., Kieu, P. H., & Dao, T. V. A. (2021). Project-based teaching in organic chemistry through blended learning model to develop self-study capacityof high school students in Vietnam. Education Sciences, 11(7), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070346
Oladejo, A. I., Okebukola, P. A., Nwaboku, N., Kola-Olusanya, A., & Olateju, T. T. (2023). Face-to-face and blended: Two pedagogical conditions for testing the efficacy of the culturo-techno-contextual approach on learning anxiety and achievement in chemistry. Education Sciences, 13(5), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050447
Pohan, L. A., & Maulina, J. (2022). Blended learning integrated with project-based learning: Itseffect on learning outcomes, perception, and self-regulated learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 6 (2), 97-106. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v6i2.48213
Ramirez, H. J. M. (2024). Exploring high school students' experiences on chemistry laboratory classes in blended learning environment. International Journal of Innovation in Scienceand Mathematics Education, 32 (4), . https://doi.org/10.30722/ijisme.32.04.001
Rojas, N. R. L. (2023). Outcomes from online vs face-to-face learning in general chemistry: Anatural experiment. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(10), 3748-3757. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00124
Selçuk, A. A. (2019). A Guide For Systematic Reviews: Prisma. Turkish Archives Of Otorhinolaryngology, 57(1), 57–58. Https://Doi.Org/10.5152/Tao.2019.4058
Sichone, A., Kaulu, G., & Nachiyunde, K. (2025). Evaluating the impact of blended learning on retention of electromagnetic induction concepts in selected zambian secondary schools. International journal of research and innovation in social science, IX (VI), 4653-4662. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.906000353
Susilaningsih, E., & Musyarofah, M. (2020). Students’ opinions about blended learning in redox material and compounds nomenclature. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 20 (2), 225-231. https://doi.org/10.17509/JPP.V20I2.23882
Syamsi, B., & Suryanda, A. (2023). Literature study: Implementation of chemistry learning using blended learning model to improve students' hots (higher order thinking skills). Jurnal Edu Science (JES), 10 (1), 273-278. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v10i1.3605
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png)
